Connect with us

War of words continue in Reps over Pantami’s saga

The war of words has continued between members of the House of Representatives over the Ali Pantami saga.

Published

on

War of words continue in Reps over Pantami's saga

The war of words has continued between members of the House of Representatives over the Ali Pantami saga.

On Saturday, the House’s spokesperson, Benjamin Kalu, insisted that the Minority Leader, Ndudi Elumelu used the wrong order in his legislative intervention.

However, the statement was in response to a press statement by the Spokesperson of the Minority Caucus, Francis Agbo, who said on Friday that Mr Kalu erroneously misrepresented legislative proceedings on the point of order raised by Elumelu.

READ ALSO: Pantami is a cold-blooded beast__ FFK

Recalled the Nigerian economist, Elumelu had on Wednesday raised a point of Order on Privilege which he called for the resignation of the Minister for alleged link to extremists.

Moreso, Mr Kalu, in his statement, insisted that the House will entertain a motion on Pantami if properly presented as a motion of urgent public importance or motion on notice.

“The House acknowledges the severity of the issue and its nature as a matter of public concern. As always, the House stands ready to give audience to Rep. Ndudi Elumelu or any other member of the House on this issue, provided that such audience is sought through the proper channels and brought under the relevant rules of the House,” the statement reads in part.

“That there are only two motions recognised by the House rules; Motion on Matters of Urgent Public Importance and Motion on Notice, the minority leader could have come under either of these but he erroneously chose to come by way of privileges.

“That the relevant issue raised by Hon Elumelu which is of national importance is inadmissible under privileges for what it seeks to address, since matters under privilege, once breached, must be personal and internal to the House.

“This is why all matters of privilege are sent to the House committee on ethics and privileges, not to the President directly as the house resolution as alleged by the yet to be tutored “spokesman” of the minority caucus. One wonders what the house committee on ethics and privilege will be doing with the sack of Pantami,” he added.

Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *